A score that tells you where you actually stand.

The problem

A practice that does not benchmark only knows its own trend — whether things are getting better or worse relative to yesterday, not relative to the market. A 94% collection rate sounds strong until you discover that practices of your specialty and size in your region average 96.5%. A wRVU per provider that grew 8% year over year looks like progress until MGMA benchmarking places it at the 28th percentile. Without external context, a practice cannot distinguish genuine performance from merely stable mediocrity.

What we build

Practice Performance Scoring assigns a structured, domain-level score across five operational dimensions — volume, revenue cycle health, provider productivity, billing efficiency, and payer mix quality — benchmarked against MGMA national data and Harine Management's regional client dataset. The output is a scored assessment with domain breakdowns and a prioritized list of improvement opportunities ranked by estimated financial impact.

What you get

• Five-domain performance score: volume, revenue cycle, provider productivity, billing efficiency, payer mix
• MGMA percentile ranking for wRVU per provider and revenue per visit at 25th, 50th, and 75th percentile
• Regional peer benchmarking for collection rate, AR aging, and denial rate
• Payer mix quality score relative to specialty standard and regional mix
• Prioritized improvement opportunity summary with estimated annual financial impact per gap
• Quarterly re-score cadence to measure improvement against initial baseline

Common questions